Monday, June 1, 2020

MBA Admissions No Lying

Youre a grownup – you dont need to be told that lying is wrong†¦or do you? This kindergarten precept often needs reviewing when MBA applications roll around. Even the most honest of applicants sometimes fall prey to the sinister temptation of the Little White Lie – Okay, so I worked there for ALMOST a year (7 months) – no one will know if I fudge that a bit on my MBA resume or Office Assistant is practically the same thing as Office Manager, right? – or bigger lies like saying you dont have a criminal record when you do or changing the data on a transcript or forging a recommenders name. These are all – big and small – serious no-nos. They are ethically wrong; and if that doesnt do it for you, try this – they are serious threats to your acceptance, and then success, at top schools and a future career. Rule of thumb: Say the facts and dont look back. Your MBA apps are not the place to lie, fib, exaggerate, misrepresent, or even avoid telling the truth. Call it what you will, just make sure you don’t do it. Here are three reasons why: Background checks are likely to turn up any material misrepresentations. When they do, the school will withdraw the offer of acceptance. You will see your acceptance turn into a rejection with the attendant embarrassment and inability to apply to those previously friendly institutions. If the lies aren’t caught during the background check, the misrepresentation may need to be perpetuated and could actually come up in the future with even more devastating and shameful consequences. (This happened to someone my husband knew at work as well as to the former head of admissions at MIT undergrad. In the former case, the false claim had NOTHING to do with work or professional competence.) There is also the possibility that in the future you will have a conflict or â€Å"falling out† with someone who knows about the fallacy. That person can then go to the school or future employer and reveal the fallacy out of spite, claiming that spasms of conscious are driving him to confess. (I have heard of such cases.) In short: Lying in applications is serious business. Even if you get away with it during the admissions process, it can still have serious consequences way down the line. Learn how to mitigate MBA profile weaknesses wisely and honestly with the expert tips founds in MBA Application Weaknesses 101. (function(){ var s='hubspotutk',r,c=((r=new RegExp('(^|; )'+s+'=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie))?r[2]:''),w=window;w[s]=w[s]||c, hsjs = document.createElement("script"), el=document.getElementById("hs-cta-52eb888c-486a-4162-b9f5-bbafc53e1a3b"); hsjs.type = "text/javascript";hsjs.async = true; hsjs.src = "//cta-service-cms2.hubspot.com/cs/loader-v2.js?pg=52eb888c-486a-4162-b9f5-bbafc53e1a3b (document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0]||document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0]).appendChild(hsjs); try{el.style.visibility="hidden";}catch(err){} setTimeout(function() {try{el.style.visibility="visible";}catch(err){}}, 2500); })(); Accepted.com ~ Helping You Write Your Best

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Why Russian Businesses Use Technologies - 1506 Words

In the world of fierce business competition, technologies often become the principal source of competitive advantage for firms. Technological innovations have already become the basic measure of entrepreneurial growth and business success, but only firms that possess unique, inimitable technology resources can successfully outperform their competitors. State and policy support is crucial for the successful adoption of technologies by firms. The case of Russia is no exception. Russia possesses a sophisticated scientific and technology base, but the rates of adoption of technologies in Russian business remain formidably low. Only a broad government-based innovation policy can help Russian businesses to move forward and to become a part of†¦show more content†¦Businesses in Russia operate in the atmosphere of economic instability and elevated legal risks, which makes successful adoption of technologies virtually impossible. Although the rates of technology adoption in Russian b usiness are gradually increasing, the country is still an eternity away from creating a perfect and profitable business-technology synergy. Russia and Russian businesses are characterized by the growing levels of technology adoption. Russian businesses rapidly expand their innovative capabilities (Gurkov 299). The more optimistic Russian CEOs feel about their business future, the higher the rates of technology adoption become (Gurkov 300). Almost every third entrepreneur and CEO in Russia that enjoys a good or excellent position in business reports intensive changes in their technological structures and infrastructures (Gurkov 300). The fact that Russia possesses a sophisticated technology base facilitates the adoption of technological innovations in Russian firms (Watkins 2). The professionalism of scientific and IT personnel facilitates the rapid advancement of technologies in Russian business. Russia’s technology and innovation potential is much greater than that of other countries with similar

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Multicultural Lit And Film An Indian Father s Plea,...

Nichole wilburn Mrs. Love Hilliard Multicultural Lit Film 30 January 2017 Why Should Love Be Shown To Others, Who Really Cares? Love and respect go hand and hand. Respect is earned but love is given, that is the only difference between them. Love should be felt all around the world and happiness will come with it also. But sometimes love isn t in people s hearts, that s when wars are created and people die. A Lot of stories written throughout history have been about love, dedication to culture, and a race separated from respect and judged harshly. In the essays An Indian Father s Plea, Gate A-4, and Just Walk On By:Black Men In Public Space, each tells of at least one and should be looked at with open eyes and minds. â€Å"police†¦show more content†¦He is 5 years old, in kindergarten, and I can t understand why you have already labeled him a slow learner’(An Indian Father’s Plea). Just because his son is seen as a slow learner at an American school, doesn t mean he is seen the same way in his own community. Native Americans where t he first people living in the Americas but were murdered and had their land and culture stolen away from them. Native Americans were seen and savages and uncivilized, but they respected nature and all living things. They only took what they needed from the land and grew their own crops for their villages. Just because they didn t wear shoes and hunted with bows and arrows doesn t mean that they were any less smart or lacking manners. All people are equal and unique and their own ways. Being in an unknown country and not being able to communicate with people could be a very scary situation. Most people that travel on airplanes to different countries speak other languages and have different customs. It s very heartwarming for people to stop everything that they are doing to go and help someone in need of assistance. â€Å"An older woman in full traditional Palestinian embroidered dress, just like my grandma wore, was crumpled to the floor, wailing. â€Å"Help,† said the flight agent. â€Å"Talk to her. What is her problem? We told her the flight was going to be late and she did this†(Gate A-4). She helped a woman understand what the airline workers were saying

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Democracy in the Philippines free essay sample

This is the moment in the history of society where technology is at its highest point and it continues to move forward. This is also the occasion when democracy in the Philippines faces one of the greatest challenges in its existence after it has been restored several times. A new round of scandal has brought democracy in the Philippines to another challenging point. If democratic revival is possible it can only come from the people themselves, and from the higher power directing it. This paper is to tackle current issues in our government that I consider a tele-novela which remains a box office hit. What I think about the ongoing saga regarding former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyos (GMA) efforts to leave the country to get medical treatment abroad and the Aquino administrations efforts to stop her. Not to mention the controversial TRO issued by the Supreme court in connection with the refusal of the DOJ secretary to implement the ruling, and most specially, the infamous ‘electoral sabotage against GMA’. All these current issues affect the democracy of our country. The strength of democracy is measured, not by economic gains, but primarily by the strength of the country’s rule of law and its justice system. The state of innocence until proven guilty is a legal right of every accused in a lawful trial. The trouble of evidence legally obtained and lawfully acceptable in a court of law is therefore on the entity that prosecutes the accused. These facts must show guilt of the accused ‘beyond reasonable doubt. ’ If reasonable doubt continues, the accused must be set free. This is how the court of law thinks and acts, in an ideal world. Sadly, the court of public view seems to sway with the wind. November 15, 2011 is a shameful day for our nation. The court of law is dragged down as substandard to the court of public opinion and this is with the initiation of the government. Former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, accused (by the Aquino government and a large part of the population) of involvedness on a number of unlawful/illegal acts, was not allowed by the Aquino government to board an airplane to travel abroad and seek further medical help. This is done after a temporary restraining order (TRO) has been released by the Supreme Court with immediate effectivity. A scandalous public display of an awful wit develops. What Is a Restraining Order? According to Lawyers. com: â€Å"A restraining order is a court order directing someone to follow certain conditions or to not do certain things. Its literally a piece of paper a judge signs stating the terms someone must follow or risk legal consequences. Restraining orders are often used to give legal protection to victims of domestic abuse, harassment, stalking and neighborhood disputes. Temporary restraining orders, another short-term order type, are usually in effect for  less than a month. This order is issued when a victim applies for a restraining order. Its purpose is to give the victim protection until a hearing can be held and a restraining order can be issued. † I noticed a lot of comments blaming the Arroyos. So far, most of the basis forwarded by these same comments relate to things outside of the immediate concerns of the drama at the NAIA. Some question the hurriedness of the Arroyos to buy plane ticket even before the release of the TRO. If the woman is truly in need of urgent medical attention, the rush is but necessary to the need. They have the money. Still, one cannot avoid the growing suspicion that the St. Luke medical team was not able to diagnose precisely all the medical illness of GMA, is I think, reason enough for a family that has the money, to look for the best medical help for their loved one in another country. Based from the Inquirer news report: The Supreme Court on Tuesday, Nov 29, 2011 clarified that it did not suspend the temporary restraining order (TRO) it granted to former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo despite her failure to fully comply with the conditions of the injunctive relief. At a news briefing, court administrator and spokesperson Jose Midas Marquez said the high court en banc issued the clarification amid allegations that the justices had temporarily recalled the TRO. â€Å"The court resolved to clarify that the TRO was not suspended even with the finding that there was no full compliance with the conditions of the TRO,† Marquez said. â€Å"There was †¦ some sort of confusion whether the TRO was in full force and effect pending full compliance of the petitioner, and that is why the court had to make a clarification,† he added. The court’s latest resolution debunked the claim of Associate Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno that majority of the justices moved to suspend the injunctive order during its special session on Nov. 18. The TRO prevented Justice Secretary Leila de Lima from enforcing the travel ban she issued against Arroyo and her husband, Jose Miguel â€Å"Mike† Arroyo. â€Å"There was just a misunderstanding and confusion so the court resolved to clarify. I think that issue should rest for now,† he said. The Supreme Court on Tuesday,11/29, also blocked the move of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to summon the attending physicians of Arroyo in a bid to justify De Lima’s decision to bar her from going abroad. Then who committed a mistake here? Some people questioned how the Arroyos know what ruling is about to be served. That could simply be explained by the real odds of this family having a person in the offices of the Supreme Court to notify them of what decision is forthcoming and use cell phones to pass on such information. It is obvious that the Arroyos do have the funds to pay for expensive plane tickets. GMA still is an elected public official and benefit from the privileges rightfully connected to that office. However, to mean that the judges owe their positions to the Arroyos and are for that reason indebted to give a positive ruling is tearing down one of the three pillars of this government. Without determining the ‘burden of proof’, a lot of people have assumed the position of a judge and marked these justices accountable as charged. In a press conference, Jose Midas Marquez said majority of the magistrates believe that â€Å"it might probably work as an injustice to them of their continued inclusion in the Watch List Order (WLO)†¦Majority is of the thought that the TRO is consistent with the constitutional presumption of innocence. He said, however, that the TRO can be lifted anytime if the high court deems forthcoming arguments sufficient to counter those of the couple. In this case, in my point of view, I dont believe the Arroyos are to blame for the terrible incident in NAIA. The supreme judge of the law of the land has pronounced judgment in favor of allowing th em to travel abroad and such order is to take effect right away. According to the Philippine Constitution: The Supreme Court of the Philippines (Filipino: Kataas-taasang Hukuman ng Pilipinas or Korte Suprema) is the Philippines highest judicial court, as well as the court of last resort. Therefore, the Department of Justice has no jurisdiction to second guess the Supreme Court unless it responds with the required legal procedures to overturn the order. Unreasonably, the DOJ challenged the very order of the Supreme Court in a manner inappropriate of an agency of the executive branch of the government. Sad to say, I dont like one bit of what the Department of Justice is doing on this case. In another different scenario, GMA is charged with electoral sabotage. Manila Times Published :  Friday, October 21, 2011 A JOINT fact-finding team on Thursday ordered the filing of formal charges for electoral sabotage against former President and now Rep. Gloria Arroyo of Pampanga province and several others in the 2007 polls. In its 81-page Initial Report, the team from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Commission on Elections (Comelec) recommended that eight others be charged for the same unbailable offense—former Comelec Chairman Benjamin Abalos Sr. ; former Comelec Commissioner Nicodemo Ferrer; former DOJ Secretary Alberto Agra; Michael Abas, former acting Region XII election director; Col. Reuben Basiao, former Region XI chief of the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP); former Gov. Andal Ampatuan Sr. of Maguindanao province; Lintang Bedol, former provincial election supervisor of Maguindanao; and Norie Unas. The report said that Mrs. Arroyo gave â€Å"direct instruction to manipulate the results† of the 2007 race for Senate seats in Maguindanao â€Å"by ordering (Ampatuan Sr. ) to implement a 12-0 result in (Maguindanao) in favor of (Arroyo administration) candidates and to alter or change the results if necessary. The joint probe further recommended expanded investigation of supposed involvement of Mrs. Arroyo’s husband, lawyer Jose Miguel â€Å"Mike† Arroyo, in the poll fraud. De Lima said that the probers headed by Prosecutor General Claro Arellano would convene on Monday to discuss other recommendations made by the DOJ-Comelec panel. In this case, Arroyo was charged primarily based on testimony of former provincial administrator Norie Unas, who claimed he had heard the former president instruct Ampatuan to ensure 12-0 victory of Team Unity in his rovince during an event in the Palace days before the 2007 polls. I believe this accusation is inescapable (if there’s such a word)! The Philippines is now considered a corrupt country and this is one proof of it. The sinners should be punished and there is no exception to this rule. Arroyo failed to submit her answer during the two-hearing preliminary investigation by the joint panel that did not grant her plea to have more ti me to file a counter affidavit. We may say that the lady is heartless and could just be faking it, and is likely to just want to escape prosecution. Yet, as already identified by the same Supreme Court, the executive branch has legal options to bring back the Arroyos to face charges filed against them without creating another incident that would bring us all to great humiliation. I’m definitely sure that democracy is a fundamental way to reassure some freedoms and never doubted its importance to the economic development of societies. I could not think of any other efficient kind of government in a long term process of development. Democracy as defined â€Å"is a government by the people, for the people, and of the people. † Yes, by the people whose absolute right to suffrage has been the accessory or partner in crime of the corrupt officials in pushing through their vested interests and motives. Enormous vote buying and vote shaving and filling become the indicator of most national and local winners whose rise to power was aided by the political alibi to lessen poverty. Eventually, these so – called leaders ruin the essence of democracy of our country.

Saturday, April 18, 2020

Soros Essays - George Soros, Central European University

Soros Today I would like to talk about the most famous international speculator of them all Geroge Soros and how he went about braking the bank of England in September 1992 and quasy single handed terminate the ERM. I have always been very fascinated by international financial speculation and the actual power the individual investor has. George Soros is proberbly the worlds most famous hedge fund manager in the world.George Soros was born in Budapest, Hungary in 1930. In 1947 he emigrated to England, where he graduated from the London School of Economics. While a student at the London School of Economics, In 1956 he moved to the United States, where he began to accumulate a large fortune through an international investment fund he founded and managed. Mr. Soros currently serves as Chairman of Soros Fund Management LLC, a private investment management firm which serves as principal investment advisor to the Quantum Group of Funds recognized as having the best performance record of any investment fund in the world in its thirty-year history. Soros Philosophy is that every exchange rate is Flawed and he sat out to prove his theory in 1992 when he attacked the EMS system in late 1992. Before the reunification of Germany the ERM had proven to one of the strongest Exchange rate systems ever created but because Germany had to be the anchor of both the its own reunification and the EMR it created a a latent flaw in the ERM. The flaw was that because of the massive capital injection from west to East Germany and the 1-1 exchange rate a high inflations pressure was developed in Germany leading to an increase of interest rates. At the same time Europe and especially Britain was in a mode of recession meaning that they were not ready for such an interest hike by the Germans. This made the Pound very valuable and since the German bundeds bank were more focused on its own situation in regards to the reunification the brits were left on their own. Soros was the first to see this development and after attending a meeting with the German Bundesbank President saying that he believed more in a strong mark then in the Future ECU. Emdiatly after these signals soros went ahead and tested his flaw theory and short the Italian lira. The Italians was not in a position to defend them selves and because of Germanys home problems know help came from them . This was a sign to Soros that the pound also was valnuable. Once again he sold pounds and when the British central bank in a last desperate attempt raised nterest rate 2% it was a clear indicator for Soros that the pound was untangeblr and he went ahead and sell pound even more agressivly and by the end of that day the pound had to retrieve from ERM and Soros had made one billion $ The consequences of this attact on the pound was that the Britain's central bank wasted its reserves in an unsuccessful effort to defend the currency's value (40 billion $). Furthermore the episode derailed Britain's membership in a European initiative seeking to rationalize exchange rates -- and it earned Soros this sobriquet: the man who broke the Bank of England. Soros once again entered the international financial stage, to prove his theory that all exhange rate systems has flaws when he attaced the currencies of south East Asia. In early 1997, Soros' funds were shorting Thailand's currency, the baht, and Malaysia's currency, the ringgit -- that is, betting that the value of both currencies would drop. In July, Thailand dropped its defenses, Devaluing the baht. That set off the wave of devaluations in Malaysia and elsewhere that marked the beginning of a global economic turmoil. That conclude my little presentation on Soros and the power that speculators have in the current international financial system. However before ending I would like to hear you opinion to whether you find such speculations directly attacing counties currencies amoral and incorrect or if you believe that such actions are legitimate. Speech and Communication Essays

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Overwhelm and Underwhelm

Overwhelm and Underwhelm Overwhelm and Underwhelm Overwhelm and Underwhelm By Simon Kewin If you can overwhelm and underwhelm, can you also â€Å"whelm†? Both overwhelm and underwhelm are common enough words, but they appear to imply the existence of a root word â€Å"whelm†. Does such a word exist and, if so, what does it mean? The Oxford definition of overwhelm is as follows : verb 1. submerge beneath a huge mass. 2. defeat completely; overpower. 3. have a strong emotional effect on. (ORIGIN from archaic whelm ‘engulf or submerge’, from Old English.) As this makes clear, whelm is a word, but it is archaic and rarely used these days. And, what’s more, whelm and overwhelm actually have more or less the same meaning, although overwhelm perhaps suggests a more intense degree of being engulfed or defeated. But it’s as if overwhelm has taken over the job of its root word, making whelm redundant. These days, the original word is generally used only in poetic or deliberately archaic language. J. R. R. Tolkien, for example, used it in The Lord of the Rings. The third sense of overwhelm listed above have a strong emotional effect on – is a very recent development in the history of this word. And it’s from this that the opposite word underwhelm was coined. To underwhelm means, simply, to fail to impress or make a positive impact on, without any of the meanings to do with flooding or defeat. In other words, underwhelm evolved from overwhelm and not, curiously, from the rarely-used root word whelm at all. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Avoid Beginning a Sentence with â€Å"With†"Certified" and "Certificated"Phrasal Verbs and Phrasal Nouns

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Public Sector Finance & Control Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Public Sector Finance & Control - Assignment Example The council had declares a policy that was to restrict the ‘Council Tax Band D’ charge to 5% above the 2011/12, increasing the charge from 155 to 162.75, consequently, the general revenue being 45, 768, 880. An increase of the charge from the 2011/12 level by 8.2% could be sufficient enough to cover the 53,469,500 general expenditures. Alternatively, certain expenditures can be reduced from the books of accounts so that revenue generated from taxes match the expenditures. Theater expenditure, capita programme expenditure, and environmental and health expenditure can be arrived at through public-private partnership. In fact, expenditure should match revenue in the non essential services. Transferring of certain essential services to be catered for by the central government can be a better alternative to managing the council bills, particularly expenditure on education and health. Through the councilors, the council should rally the members to pass the adjustment so that the desired council tax band d for 2012/2013 is achieved, otherwise at the projected rate of 5% would not achieve the projected revenue demands. A marriage of geographical positioning of the Council Tax Band D equivalent, increase in the charge and reduction in expenditures or a private public arrangement can aid in matching expenditure to revenue. In the United States, water and sewer service, garbage collections have been privatized and these reduce the overall expenditure budget. The budgeting process consists of fundamental chain of activities which can be considered in the following guidelines: budgetary framework, budgetary methodologies, and allocation of resources to the budget activities. A budget framework, on the other hand is defined by certain critical factors namely: timeframe, in the case study, budget as prepared for the 2012/13 financial year, while the previous one was prepared for the 2011/12